| |
HRD
> Policy Development > Topical
FMLA Archive >
Topical
FMLA Archive
Miscellaneous Issues
Employee's
failure to comply with absence-reporting policies
- HOLMES v. THE BOEING COMPANY
U.S. District Court District of Kansas, 4 WH Cases2d 766,
2/3/1998, No. 96-1424-JTM
Employer did not violate FMLA when it failed to restore employee
to his former position or equivalent one upon return from FMLA
leave, where employee's failure to comply with employer's policies
for reporting absences was sufficient reason to justify his discharge.
Employer lawfully discharged employee for failing to comply with
its policies for reporting absences and did not improperly deny
the employee FMLA leave. Employee failed to offer any evidence
that the employer's reasons for discharge were pretext.
Poor
performance
- McCOWN v. UOP, INC.
U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois, 2 WH Cases2d
1669, 8/29/1995, No. 94 C 2179
Employer did not violate FMLA when it discharged employee
who had been granted a reduced work schedule under the Act, where
employee did not establish that her employer's asserted reasons
for discharge--poor performance and excessive absences, tardiness,
and personal phone calls--were pretext.
Substitution
of paid leave
- COX v. AUTOZONE, INC.
U.S. District Court Middle District of Alabama, 4 WH Cases2d
590, 1/20/1998, No. 97-A-478-N
Store manager who received employer-provided disability pay
for 13 of 15 weeks of leave she took because of pregnancy has
no case under FMLA, even though she was not restored to equivalent
position, despite her contention that employer harassed her so
severely as to amount to constructive discharge. The Act provides
protection only when employee takes twelve or fewer weeks of leave.
Manager took more than twelve weeks of leave, she collected disability
pay while doing so, and employer properly counted that paid leave
against her FMLA entitlement. Provision of act allowing employee
to elect, or employer to require employee, to substitute accrued
paid leave for leave provided under act exists so that employees
may not be told that leave must be taken as unpaid when alternative
of employer-provided paid leave exists. Provision does not require
that employee be given twelve unpaid weeks of leave in addition
to paid weeks provided by employer.
|